ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2024
Clinicopathologic assessment of secondary syphilis avoids misdiagnosis: results of comprehensive evaluation of 114 cases.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Secondary syphilis is well-known for its protean cutaneous manifestations and therefore very easy to be misdiagnosed. Aim: The current study was to observe the frequency of histopathological features characterizing secondary syphilis, and summarize the diseases most likely to be misdiagnosed. Material and methods: In this study a total of 129 pathological specimens from 114 patients with biopsy-proven secondary syphilis were retrospectively analysed and categorized according to clinicopathologic characteristics. The frequency of histopathological features characterizing secondary syphilis were analysed by comparison with clinical features. Results: We found that in a single sample there is at least one feature or at most 13 features exist concurrently, and most demonstrated between 5 and 9 diagnostic features. Plasma cells (97.6% overall vs. 94.0% ≤ 6 features), endothelial swelling (86.8% vs. 74.0%), epidermis hyperplasia (73.6% vs. 62.0%) especially irregular acanthosis, lymphocytes infiltration (71.3% vs. 52.0%) and interstitial patterns (69% vs. 72.0%) were the most common findings in all cases as well as in cases with ≤ 6 features. Granulomatous inflammation is an uncommon histopathologic pattern in secondary syphilis (12.4%). The rash morphologies of our biopsies mainly manifesting as macules and maculopapules were more likely to have 6 or fewer features, which were not only easily misdiagnosed for pityriasis rosea, tinea and erythema multiforme, but also mostly taken from the trunk and genitalia. Atypical morphologies can be combined with plasma cell infiltration and T. pallidum immunohistochemical stain to confirm the diagnosis. Conclusions: In this study plasma cells from superficial and deep perivascular distribution to nodular infiltration were a crucial clue for diagnosis of secondary syphilis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.