ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2024
Non-contrast MRI of micro-vascularity of the feet and toes.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop novel non-contrast MR perfusion techniques for assessing micro-vascularity of the foot in human subjects.
methodsAll experiments were performed on a clinical 3 T scanner using arterial spin labeling (ASL). Seven healthy subjects (30-72 years old, 5 males and 2 females) were enrolled and bilateral feet were imaged with tag-on and tag-off alternating inversion recovery spin labeling for determining micro-vascularity. We compared an ASL technique with 1-tag against 4-tag pulses. For perfusion, we determined signal increase ratio (SIR) at varying inversion times (TI) from 0.5 to 2 s. SIR versus TI data were fit to determine perfusion metrics of peak height (PH), time to peak (TTP), full width at half maximum (FWHM), area under the curve (AUC), and apparent blood flow (aBF) in the distal foot and individual toes. Using analysis of variance (ANOVA), effects of tag pulse and region of interest (ROI) on the mean perfusion metrics were assessed. In addition, a 4-tag pulse perfusion experiment was performed on patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and Raynaud's disease.
resultsUsing our MR perfusion techniques, SIR versus TI data showed well-defined leading and trailing edges, with a peak near TI of 0.75-1.0 s and subsiding quickly to near zero by TI of 2 s, particularly when 4-tag pulses were used. When imaged with 4-tag pulse, we found significantly greater values in perfusion metrics, as compared to 1-tag pulse. The patients with PAD and Raynaud's disease showed a reduced or scattered perfusion curves compared to the healthy control.
conclusionMR perfusion imaging of the distal foot shows greater SIR and perfusion metrics with the 4-tag pulse compared to the 1-tag pulse technique. This will likely benefit those with low perfusion due to aging, PAD, diabetic foot, and other vascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.