Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38538580›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Collective incentives reduce over-exploitation of social information in unconstrained human groups.

Dominik Deffner, David Mezey, Benjamin Kahl, Alexander Schakowski, Pawel Romanczuk, Charley M Wu, Ralf H J M Kurvers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predecisional information search adaptively reduces three types of uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dominik DeffnerCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. deffner@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-3861
David MezeyScience of Intelligence Excellence Cluster, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Benjamin KahlCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander SchakowskiCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Pawel RomanczukScience of Intelligence Excellence Cluster, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-998X
Charley M WuCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf H J M KurversCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-0392

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01IS18039ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 390523135Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 390727645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective dynamics emerge from countless individual decisions. Yet, we poorly understand the processes governing dynamically-interacting individuals in human collectives under realistic conditions. We present a naturalistic immersive-reality experiment where groups of participants searched for rewards in different environments, studying how individuals weigh personal and social information and how this shapes individual and collective outcomes. Capturing high-resolution visual-spatial data, behavioral analyses revealed individual-level gains-but group-level losses-of high social information use and spatial proximity in environments with concentrated (vs. distributed) resources. Incentivizing participants at the group (vs. individual) level facilitated adaptation to concentrated environments, buffering apparently excessive scrounging. To infer discrete choices from unconstrained interactions and uncover the underlying decision mechanisms, we developed an unsupervised Social Hidden Markov Decision model. Computational results showed that participants were more sensitive to social information in concentrated environments frequently switching to a social relocation state where they approach successful group members. Group-level incentives reduced participants' overall responsiveness to social information and promoted higher selectivity over time. Finally, mapping group-level spatio-temporal dynamics through time-lagged regressions revealed a collective exploration-exploitation trade-off across different timescales. Our study unravels the processes linking individual-level strategies to emerging collective dynamics, and provides tools to investigate decision-making in freely-interacting collectives.

Indexed as

MotivationSocial BehaviorDecision MakingHumans

Identifiers

PMID38538580
PMCPMC10973496

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.