ReviewCancers2024
A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Modalities and Strategies for the Assessment of Complications in Adult Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives of Adult Patients and Caregivers on the Management and Challenges Associated with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Plexiform Neurofibromas: A Multinational Qualitative Survey.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Pediatric mortality from neurofibromatosis and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in Brazil, 2008-2023: a 16-year nationwide analysis of persistent disparities.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Exploring global access to healthcare and utilisation for neurocutaneous syndromes: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Surveillance of Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based tools for precision diagnosis and treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1 associated peripheral and central glial tumors.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- Unraveling novel variants in the NF1 gene and investigating potential therapeutic strategies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The genetic spectrum ofNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurofibromatosis Type 1 is an autosomal dominant tumour-predisposition condition commonly diagnosed in childhood and fully penetrant by adulthood. Long-term monitoring through imaging is inconsistent and varies between high- and low-income countries. Implementation of a clinical practice guideline through a multidisciplinary clinic is instrumental to the care of adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients. We aim to systematically review international diagnostic modalities and strategies to evaluate any association between a country's socioeconomic status and diagnostic modalities or strategies used for Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Relevant clinical information on the surveillance of adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients worldwide was reviewed, extracted, and synthesised.
resultsWe identified 51 papers reporting on 7724 individuals. Multiple imaging modalities are actively employed in high-income and upper-middle-income countries for surveying adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients. We did not find any relevant papers from low- and middle-income countries.
conclusionsThis systematic review suggests that there is robust data on diagnostic modalities for adult Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients in high-income countries, but not for low- and middle-income countries. There is a lack of data on consolidated diagnostic strategies from both high- and low-income countries. Efforts should be made to publish data on usual clinical practice in low- and middle-income countries to develop clinical practice guidelines describing best medical practice to fit a local context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.