Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539465›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Deep-Learning-Based Predictive Imaging Biomarker Model for EGFR Mutation Status in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from CT Imaging.

Abhishek Mahajan, Vatsal Kania, Ujjwal Agarwal, Renuka Ashtekar, Shreya Shukla, Vijay Maruti Patil, Vanita Noronha, Amit Joshi, Nandini Menon, Rajiv Kumar Kaushal and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Radiogenomics-based prediction ofZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abhishek MahajanDepartment of Imaging, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L7 8YA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6606-6537
Vatsal KaniaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Ujjwal AgarwalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Renuka AshtekarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Shreya ShuklaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-9252
Vijay Maruti PatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Amit JoshiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Nandini MenonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Rajiv Kumar KaushalDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Swapnil RaneDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Anuradha ChouguleDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9889-2136
Suthirth VaidyaPredible Health, IKP Eden, Bangalore 560029, Karnataka, India.
Krishna KaluvaPredible Health, IKP Eden, Bangalore 560029, Karnataka, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

DBT-BIRAC by Predible Health NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe authors aimed to develop and validate deep-learning-based radiogenomic (DLR) models and radiomic signatures to predict the EGFR mutation in patients with NSCLC, and to assess the semantic and clinical features that can contribute to detecting EGFR mutations.

methodsUsing 990 patients from two NSCLC trials, we employed an end-to-end pipeline analyzing CT images without precise segmentation. Two 3D convolutional neural networks segmented lung masses and nodules.

resultsThe combined radiomics and DLR model achieved an AUC of 0.88 ± 0.03 in predicting EGFR mutation status, outperforming individual models. Semantic features further improved the model's accuracy, with an AUC of 0.88 ± 0.05. CT semantic features that were found to be significantly associated with EGFR mutations were pure solid tumours with no associated ground glass component (

conclusionsThis AI-based radiomics and DLR model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting EGFR mutation, serving as a non-invasive and user-friendly imaging biomarker for EGFR mutation status prediction.

Indexed as

deep learningEGFRmachine learningnon-small cell lung cancerradiomicssemantics

Identifiers

PMID38539465
PMCPMC10968632
OpenAlexW4392697024

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.