Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38539938›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

The Genetic Basis Underpinning Sexually Selected Traits across Different Animal Lineages: Are There Genetic Mechanisms in Common?

Ji Hyoun Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ji Hyoun KangKorean Entomological Institute, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1782-2476

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1A2C1009024National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020R1C1C1007098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection involving female choice or female preference ('inter-sexual' selection) and/or male-male competition ('intra-sexual' selection) is one of the key mechanisms for evolutionary diversification and speciation. In particular, sexual selection is recently suggested to be an important mode to drive the evolution of the "novel" phenotype (i.e., "evolutionary novelty"). Despite extensive studies performed on sexually selected traits or male-specific ornaments (or weapon-like structures) with respect to their evolutionary origin, history and fitness benefits, relatively little is known about the molecular genetic mechanisms underlying their developmental process. However, with advances in genomic technologies (including whole transcriptome analysis using Next Generation Sequencing [NGS] techniques; RNA-Seq), progress has been made to unveil the genetic background underpinning diverse sexually selected traits in different animal taxa. In the present review, empirical data on the genes, genetic mechanisms, or regulatory pathways underlying various sexually selected traits were compiled to explore whether "common" genetic architectures shape the development and evolution of these traits across evolutionarily distant animal lineages. It is shown that the recruitment of the pre-existing genetic network for a new purpose (i.e., gene network "co-option") is rather widespread in the development and evolution of sexually selected traits, indicating that particular genes or gene sets are repeatedly involved in different sexually selected traits. Information on genes or genetic mechanisms regulating the development of sexually selected traits is an essential piece to complete a whole picture of the origin and evolution of sexually selected traits.

Indexed as

co-optionevolutionary noveltymale ornamentmale-specific traitsexual selection

Identifiers

PMID38539938
PMCPMC10967623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.