ReviewBiomedicines2024
Charting the Course in Sequencing Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer.
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical advances and challenges of antibody-mediated targeted drug delivery in breast cancer therapeutics.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- HER2-Low and HER2-Ultralow Metastatic Breast Cancer and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: Common Clinical Questions and Answers.Cancers · 2025Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs): current and future biopharmaceuticals.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer treatment: resistance mechanisms and the role of therapeutic sequencing.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
- Escalation and optimisation of primary breast cancer treatment with antibody-drug conjugates.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025Review
- Article
- Predictive Factors of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the unprecedented results observed in recent clinical trials, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized the treatment algorithm of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The strategy of sequencing different ADCs in other lines of therapy is highly attractive, but the proportion of patients who have undergone such a strategy in the context of published clinical trials is still limited, especially for modern ADCs. HER2-positive disease is primarily managed with a sequence of different ADCs. Historically, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has been the most commonly used ADC for both early and metastatic HER2-positive disease. Considering the recent evidence related to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), it is expected to assume the role of the main ADC in our clinical practice. Herein, we report a retrospective analysis of the sequence of different ADCs relying on available published data from clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.