Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38540244›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Impaired Response to Mismatch Novelty in the Li

Carlos Nascimento, Vasco Guerreiro-Pinto, Seweryn Pawlak, Ana Caulino-Rocha, Laia Amat-Garcia, Diana Cunha-Reis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlos NascimentoUnidade de Fisiologia Clínica e Translacional, Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
Vasco Guerreiro-PintoBioISI-Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Seweryn PawlakBioISI-Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Ana Caulino-RochaBioISI-Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Laia Amat-GarciaBioISI-Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Diana Cunha-ReisBioISI-Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0900-9306
University of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Erasmus+ Laia Amat-GarciaErasmus+ Seweryn PawlakFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia DL57/2016/CP1479/CT0044Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PTDC/SAU-NEU/103639/2008Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PTDC/SAUPUB/28311/2017Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/81358/2011Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04046/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/04046/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novelty detection, crucial to episodic memory formation, is impaired in epileptic patients with mesial temporal lobe resection. Mismatch novelty detection, that activates the hippocampal CA1 area in humans and is vital for memory reformulation and reconsolidation, is also impaired in patients with hippocampal lesions. In this work, we investigated the response to mismatch novelty, as occurs with the new location of known objects in a familiar environment, in the Li

Indexed as

5-HTcatecholaminesepilepsyhippocampuslearning and memorymismatch novelty

Identifiers

PMID38540244
PMCPMC10968540
OpenAlexW4392699963

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.