ReviewBiomedicines2024
High Hopes for the Biofabrication of Articular Cartilage-What Lies beyond the Horizon of Tissue Engineering and 3D Bioprinting?
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transformation of the Biological Paradigm in Bone Regeneration: An Integrative Review.Journal of developmental biology · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy Mediated by Physical Cues and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Restoring articular cartilage: insights from structure, composition and development.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Technologies and biomaterials for 3D bioprinting have been developing extremely quickly in the past decade as they hold great potential in tissue engineering. This, together with the possibility to differentiate stem cells of different origin into any cell type, raises the hopes in regenerative medicine once again after the initial breakthrough with stem cells in the 1980s. Nevertheless, three decades of 3D bioprinting experiments have shown that the production of functional tissues would take a longer time than anticipated. Cartilage, one of the simplest tissues in the body, consists of only one cell type. It is not vascularised and innervated and does not have lymphatic vessels either, which makes it a perfect target tissue for successful implantation. The tremendous amount of work since the beginning of this century, combining the efforts of bioengineers, material scientists, biologists, and physicians, has culminated in multiple proof-of-concept constructs that have been implanted in animals. However, there is no single reproducible, standardised, widely accessible and accepted strategy that can be readily applied in the clinic. In this review, we focus on the current progress in the field of the 3D biofabrication of articular cartilage and critically assess failures and future challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.