ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Epigenetic and Transcriptional Shifts in Human Neural Stem Cells after Reprogramming into Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Subsequent Redifferentiation.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating neuron-derived cfDNA for blood-based detection of Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative conditions.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Roots of Progress: Uncovering Cerebellar Ataxias Using iPSC Models.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and their derivatives have been described to display epigenetic memory of their founder cells, as well as de novo reprogramming-associated alterations. In order to selectively explore changes due to the reprogramming process and not to heterologous somatic memory, we devised a circular reprogramming approach where somatic stem cells are used to generate iPSCs, which are subsequently re-differentiated into their original fate. As somatic founder cells, we employed human embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) and compared them to iPSC-derived NSCs derived thereof. Global transcription profiling of this isogenic circular system revealed remarkably similar transcriptomes of both NSC populations, with the exception of 36 transcripts. Amongst these we detected a disproportionately large fraction of X chromosomal genes, all of which were upregulated in iPSC-NSCs. Concurrently, we detected differential methylation of X chromosomal sites spatially coinciding with regions harboring differentially expressed genes. While our data point to a pronounced overall reinstallation of autosomal transcriptomic and methylation signatures when a defined somatic lineage is propagated through pluripotency, they also indicate that X chromosomal genes may partially escape this reinstallation process. Considering the broad application of iPSCs in disease modeling and regenerative approaches, such reprogramming-associated alterations in X chromosomal gene expression and DNA methylation deserve particular attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.