Evidence mapPaperPMID 38542247Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Natural Compounds and Biomimetic Engineering to Influence Fibroblast Behavior in Wound Healing.

Charlotte E Berry, Camille Brenac, Caroline E Gonzalez, Carter B Kendig, Thalia Le, Nicholas An, Michelle F Griffin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Wound Closure Promotion by Leucine-Based Pseudo-Proteins: An In Vitro Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte E BerryHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive West, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6310-5921
Camille BrenacHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive West, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7085-748X
Caroline E GonzalezFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Carter B KendigHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive West, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Thalia LeHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive West, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nicholas AnHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive West, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8800-5365
Michelle F GriffinHagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Drive West, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout history, natural products have played a significant role in wound healing. Fibroblasts, acting as primary cellular mediators in skin wound healing, exhibit behavioral responses to natural compounds that can enhance the wound healing process. Identifying bioactive natural compounds and understanding their impact on fibroblast behavior offers crucial translational opportunities in the realm of wound healing. Modern scientific techniques have enabled a detailed understanding of how naturally derived compounds modulate wound healing by influencing fibroblast behavior. Specific compounds known for their wound healing properties have been identified. Engineered biomimetic compounds replicating the natural wound microenvironment are designed to facilitate normal healing. Advanced delivery methods operating at micro- and nano-scales have been developed to effectively deliver these novel compounds through the stratum corneum. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the efficacy of natural compounds in influencing fibroblast behavior for promoting wound regeneration and repair. Additionally, it explores biomimetic engineering, where researchers draw inspiration from nature to create materials and devices mimicking physiological cues crucial for effective wound healing. The review concludes by describing novel delivery mechanisms aimed at enhancing the bioavailability of natural compounds. Innovative future strategies involve exploring fibroblast-influencing pathways, responsive biomaterials, smart dressings with real-time monitoring, and applications of stem cells. However, translating these findings to clinical settings faces challenges such as the limited validation of biomaterials in large animal models and logistical obstacles in industrial production. The integration of ancient remedies with modern approaches holds promise for achieving effective and scar-free wound healing.

Indexed as

BiomimeticsWound HealingAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCicatrixFibroblastsSkinBiocompatible Materialsbiomimetic engineeringfibroblastfibroblast behaviornatural compoundswound healing

Identifiers

PMID38542247
PMCPMC10970265
OpenAlexW4392810234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.