Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38544853›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Psychological distress among individuals with a suicide attempt or suicidal ideation and suicide attempts patterns: first two years of the pandemic.

Annekatrin Groh, Lydia Bahlmann, Lejla Colic, Alexandra Schulz, Ulrich W Kastner, Udo Polzer, Martin Walter, Thomas Sobanski, Gerd Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annekatrin GrohDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena Center for Mental Health, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Lydia BahlmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena Center for Mental Health, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Lejla ColicDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena Center for Mental Health, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Alexandra SchulzDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatic Medicine, Thueringen-Kliniken "Georgius Agricola" GmbH, Saalfeld, Germany.
Ulrich W KastnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Addiction, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Klinikum am Europakanal, Erlangen, Germany.
Udo PolzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Asklepios-Fachklinikum, Stadtroda, Germany.
Martin WalterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena Center for Mental Health, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Thomas SobanskiNetwork for Suicide Prevention in Thuringia (NeST), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Gerd WagnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jena Center for Mental Health, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEAsklepios Fachklinikum Brandenburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions may have led to increased stress, particularly in people with mental health problems. Since stress factors play important role in the emergence of suicide attempts (SA) and suicidal ideation (SI), they may have been exacerbated by the pandemic, which could have led to an increased number of suicide attempts. Thus, we first investigated whether the pandemic affected personal stress experiences and appraisal of coping potential in individuals with and without SA and SI. In a second step, we analyzed the frequency and dynamics of SAs by patients admitted to a psychiatric university clinic over a period of four years. Methods: We examined stress experiences and appraisal of coping resources of inpatients recruited between March 2021 and February 2022 with SA (n=38), SI (n=27), and with mood disorder without SA or SI (n=45). In the second study, we investigated the time course of prospectively recorded patients with a suicide attempt (n=399) between January 1 Results: There was a significant main effect of group (F[2,107]=6.58, p=0.002) regarding psychological stress levels, which was significantly higher in the SA and SI groups than in the psychiatric control group. No significant differences were found in the appraisal of coping resources or in the frequency of SAs before and during pandemic. However, the pandemic had a significant impact on the seasonal pattern of SAs. Conclusions: The pandemic increased psychological stress levels in individuals with SA and SI, which may be related to SI and do not necessarily result in SA. The pandemic did not affect the overall frequency of SA between March 2020 and December 2021, but interfered with the seasonal pattern of SA occurrence. Effective intervention strategies during a pandemic should include programs to strengthen the psychological resilience of people who are susceptible to mental health problems.

Indexed as

coping resourcesCOVID-19interrupted time series analysismental healthpsychological stresssuicidal ideationsuicidesuicide attempts

Identifiers

PMID38544853
PMCPMC10966906
OpenAlexW4392593290

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.