ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024
A Risk Model for 28-Day in-Hospital Mortality in 173 COVID-19 Patients Admission to ICU: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The surge in the number of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 since China's open-door policy has placed a huge burden on the public healthcare system, especially the intensive care system. This study's objective was to discover possible clinical outcome predictors in COVID-19 patients treated in intensive care units (ICUs) and to provide useful information for future preventative efforts and therapies. Methods: This retrospective study included 173 COVID-19 critically ill patients and reviewed the 28-day survival outcome in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Competing risk analysis was performed to predict the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of mortality in hospital. The independent prognostic factors were identified by applying the Fine-Gray proportional subdistribution hazard model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate model efficacy, and calibration curves were used to validate the model. Finally, we compared the competing risk model with the traditional proportional hazards model (Cox regression model) using CIF. Results: Of these 173 patients, 66 (38.2%) survived, 55 (31.8%) died, and 52 (30.0%) discharged. In univariate analysis, 12 variables were significantly correlated with mortality. In multivariate analysis, Age, Neutrophil ratio, Direct Bilirubin (DBIL) and Renal disease were independent predictors of 28-day outcome. The ROC curve of the multivariate prediction model showed an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.790. The results of the calibration curve and the concordance index (C-index) show that the model has good discriminatory power. The competing risk model we applied was more accurate than the Cox model. Conclusion: We presented a more accurate multivariate prediction model for 28-day in-hospital mortality for ICU COVID-19 patients using a competing risk model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.