Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38545618›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Transfemoral prosthetic simulators versus amputees: ground reaction forces and spatio-temporal parameters in gait.

Toshiki Kobayashi, Abu Jor, Yufan He, Mingyu Hu, Mark W P Koh, Genki Hisano, Takeshi Hara, Hiroaki Hobara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Toshiki KobayashiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-9670
Abu JorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-8594
Yufan HeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8047-5680
Mingyu HuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0449-8833
Mark W P KohDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Genki HisanoFaculty of Advanced Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1656-3231
Takeshi HaraFaculty of Advanced Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki HobaraFaculty of Advanced Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-9962
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKTokyo University of Science · JPKhulna University of Engineering and Technology · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the ground reaction forces (GRFs) and spatio-temporal parameters as well as their asymmetry ratios in gait between individuals wearing a transfemoral prosthetic simulator (TFSim) and individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFAmp) across a range of walking speeds (2.0-5.5 km h

Indexed as

ambulationground reaction forcekineticsspeedsymmetrywalk

Identifiers

PMID38545618
PMCPMC10966393
OpenAlexW4393225529

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.