Evidence mapPaperPMID 38545720Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2025

Carnosine/histidine-containing dipeptide supplementation improves depression and quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Robel Hussen Kabthymer, Saeede Saadati, Mark Lee, Rohit Hariharan, Jack Feehan, Aya Mousa, Barbora de Courten

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robel Hussen KabthymerDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Saeede SaadatiDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark LeeSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rohit HariharanDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jack FeehanInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Aya MousaMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7356-4523
Barbora de CourtenDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8760-2511
Monash University · AUMonash Health · AURMIT University · AUVictoria University · AU

Funding

Monash UniversityNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNHMRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMental ill-health is a common and growing issue, affecting 1 in 8 individuals or 970 million people worldwide in 2019. Histidine-containing dipeptides (HCDs) have been suggested to mitigate some aspects of mental ill-health, but a quantitative synthesis of the evidence is lacking. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted.

objectiveTo summarize the evidence on the effects of HCDs on mental health outcomes. DATA SOURCE: A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases (Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) from inception to October, 2022. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently extracted data using a structured extraction format. DATA ANALYSIS: Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17. Random-effects models were used, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Quality appraisal was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

conclusion5507 studies were identified, with 20 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies comprising 776 participants were included in the meta-analysis. HCD supplementation (anserine/carnosine, l-carnosine, β-alanine) caused a significant reduction in depression scores measured with the Becks Depression Inventory (-0.79; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.35; moderate certainty on GRADE) when compared with placebo. An increase in quality-of-life scores measured with the 36-item Short-Form survey (SF-36) (0.65; 95% CI: 0.00, 1.30) and low certainty on GRADE in HCDs (anserine/carnosine, l-carnosine, β-alanine) when compared with placebo were found. However, the rest of the outcomes did not show a significant change between HCD supplementation and placebo. Although the number of studies included in the meta-analysis was modest, a significant mean reduction was observed in depression score as well as an increase in quality-of-life score for the HCD group when compared with placebo. Most of the studies included had small sample sizes with short follow-up periods and moderate to high risk of bias, highlighting the need for further, well-designed studies to improve the evidence base. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017075354.

Indexed as

CarnosineDepressionDipeptidesHistidineQuality of LifeDietary SupplementsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCarnosineDipeptidesHistidinecarnosinedepressionhistidine-containing dipeptidemeta-analysisquality of life

Identifiers

PMID38545720
PMCPMC12013809
OpenAlexW4393265449

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.