ArticleEJNMMI research2024
Automated extraction of the arterial input function from brain images for parametric PET studies.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Image-derived input functions for [18F]LW223 and [18F]SynVesT-1 PET in the rodent determined using an autoencoder (IDIF-AE).Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Automatic detection of arterial input function for brain DCE-MRI in multi-site cohorts.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Model selection for dynamic PET compartmental modelling ofEJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Non-invasive arterial input function estimation using an MRA atlas and machine learning.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate measurement of the arterial input function (AIF) is crucial for parametric PET studies, but the AIF is commonly derived from invasive arterial blood sampling. It is possible to use an image-derived input function (IDIF) obtained by imaging a large blood pool, but IDIF measurement in PET brain studies performed on standard field of view scanners is challenging due to lack of a large blood pool in the field-of-view. Here we describe a novel automated approach to estimate the AIF from brain images.
resultsTotal body
conclusionsOur automated AIF framework accurately estimates the AIF from brain images. It reduces operator-dependence, and could facilitate the clinical adoption of parametric PET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.