Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38559465›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2024

Causes and Effects of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Pregnant Women and its Association with Adverse Maternal, Placental, and Perinatal Outcomes.

Kristen Lee Moriarty, Roselyn O Oyenuga, Olatoyosi Olafuyi, David A Schwartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristen Lee MoriartyDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Roselyn O OyenugaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Olatoyosi OlafuyiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
David A SchwartzPerinatal Pathology Consulting, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations identified to be severely affected by COVID-19, such as pregnant patients, require special consideration in vaccine counseling, access, and provider education. Maternal infection with COVID-19 poses a significant risk to the maternal-fetal dyad with known adverse placenta destruction [1-5]. Despite the widespread access and availability of vaccinations, vaccine hesitancy continues to persist and is highly prevalent in pregnant populations [6-9]. Addressing the multitude of social ecological factors surrounding vaccine hesitancy can aid in providing holistic counseling [10]. However, such factors are foremost shaped by maternal concern over possible fetal effects from vaccination. While changes in policy can help foster vaccine access and acceptance, increasing global provider education and incorporation of motivational interviewing skills are the first steps towards increasing maternal acceptance.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnant PeopleCOVID-19 VaccinesEducational StatusFemaleHumansPlacentaPregnancyVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancyCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy pregnancyinfant outcomes COVID-19maternal outcomes COVID-19perinatal deathstillbirth

Identifiers

PMID38559465
PMCPMC10964823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.