ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022
The effects of demographic, psychosocial, and socioeconomic characteristics on access to heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart transplant outcomes in patients with substance use disorder history: a nationwide cohort study using high-dimensional propensity score matching.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Article
- Increased disparities in waitlist and post-heart transplantation outcomes according to socioeconomic status with the new heart transplant allocation system.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to better understand how demographic, psychosocial, and socioeconomic factors influence the selection of patients for advanced therapies for heart failure (heart transplant and left ventricular assist device (LVAD)). Methods: Patients evaluated for heart transplant or LVAD at a large, Midwestern hospital system were assessed retrospectively. Three outcomes were analyzed: 1) Patients who were evaluated and approved to receive a transplant or LVAD were compared to patients who were not approved for transplant or LVAD; 2) Patients who were listed for transplant were compared to patients not listed; and 3) Patients who received a transplant or LVAD were compared to patients who did not receive a transplant or LVAD. ANOVA was used for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. Significant variables were further analyzed by logistic regression. Results: Four hundred fifty-nine patients were included. Marital status (p = 0.004), race (p = 0.008), social support (p < 0.001), mental health (p = 0.006), and substance use (p < 0.001) were associated with whether patients were approved for transplant or LVAD. Patients with public insurance were half as likely (OR 0.495) to be listed for transplant once approved. Conclusions: Financial, psychosocial, and demographic characteristics all play a role in selection for advanced therapies for heart failure. These insights can help guide future work on interventions to address the social disparities in access to heart transplant and LVAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.