Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38560620›Full record

ReviewBioscience2024

Increasing the impact of vertebrate scientific collections through 3D imaging: The openVertebrate (oVert) Thematic Collections Network.

David C Blackburn, Doug M Boyer, Jaimi A Gray, Julie Winchester, John M Bates, Stephanie L Baumgart, Emily Braker, Daryl Coldren, Kevin W Conway, Alison Davis Rabosky and 27 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
64.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

David C BlackburnFlorida Museum of Natural History (FLMNH), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-9886
Doug M BoyerDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Jaimi A GrayFlorida Museum of Natural History (FLMNH), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
Julie WinchesterDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
John M BatesField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Stephanie L BaumgartUniversity of Chicago and University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-7389
Emily BrakerUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States.
Daryl ColdrenField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Kevin W ConwayTexas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States.
Alison Davis RaboskyUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4664-8246
Noé de la SanchaChicago State University DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Casey B DillmanCornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0582-0740
Jonathan L DunnumMuseum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.
Catherine M EarlyFLMNH Science Museum of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States.
Benjamin W FrableScripps Institute of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.
Matt W GageHarvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.
James HankenHarvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.
Jessica A MaisanoUniversity of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas, United States.
Ben D MarksField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Katherine P MaslenikovUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
John E McCormackOccidental College, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Ramon S NagesanUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Gregory G PandelisUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Heather L PrestridgeTexas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States.
Daniel L RaboskyUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Zachary S RandallFlorida Museum of Natural History (FLMNH), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
Mark B RobbinsUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.
Lauren A ScheinbergCalifornia Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States.
Carol L SpencerUniversity of California, Berkeley, in Berkeley, California, United States.
Adam P SummersUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Leif TapanilaIdaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States.
Cody W Thompson
Luke TornabeneUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Greg J Watkins-ColwellYale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Luke J WeltonUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.
oVert Project Team
Edward L StanleyFlorida Museum of Natural History (FLMNH), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
Florida Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Michigan · USField Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Washington · USDuke University · USHarvard University Press · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Kansas · USCalifornia Academy of Sciences · USCornell University · USDePaul University · USIdaho State University · USOccidental College · USScience Museum of Minnesota · USScripps Institution of Oceanography · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of preserved museum specimens is transforming and increasing by three-dimensional (3D) imaging that creates high-fidelity online digital specimens. Through examples from the openVertebrate (oVert) Thematic Collections Network, we describe how we created a digitization community dedicated to the shared vision of making 3D data of specimens available and the impact of these data on a broad audience of scientists, students, teachers, artists, and more. High-fidelity digital 3D models allow people from multiple communities to simultaneously access and use scientific specimens. Based on our multiyear, multi-institution project, we identify significant technological and social hurdles that remain for fully realizing the potential impact of digital 3D specimens.

Indexed as

comparative anatomycomputed tomography (CT)data sharinglight scanningnatural history collectionsphotogrammetry

Identifiers

PMID38560620
PMCPMC10977868
OpenAlexW4392498823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.