ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2022
Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Pooled it
- Narrowing sex differences in pharmacotherapy following invasive angiography for coronary artery disease between 2017 and 2024.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Care Pathways After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Gender-Based Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond one-size-fits-all: addressing sex differences and promoting inclusive leadership in cardiovascular research and healthcare.BMC medicine · 2025Review
- Addressing Gender Disparities in Cardiovascular Care: Guideline-Oriented PCI for Women and the Hua-Mulan Conundrum.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Behavioral delays in seeking care among post-acute myocardial infarction women: a qualitative study following percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Intravascular Ultrasound Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Complex Higher Risk-Indicated Patients (CHIPs): Insight from Clinical Evidence.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Quality of cardiovascular care in 2024.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- The Importance of Equity in Health Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review evaluates published data regarding outcomes for women with ACS undergoing PCI. Data is discussed from a patient centred perspective and timeline, beginning with sex-based differences in perception of risk, time to presentation, time to treatment, access to angiography, access to angioplasty, the impact of incomplete revascularization, prescribing practices, under-representation of women in randomized controlled trials and in cardiology physician workforces. The objective of the review is to identify factors contributing to outcome disparities for women with ACS, and to discuss potential solutions to close this outcome gap.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.