ArticleNeuroepidemiology2024
Uncovering Predictors of Low Hippocampal Volume: Evidence from a Large-Scale Machine-Learning-Based Study in the UK Biobank.
Article in Neuroepidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Polygenic Risk of Depression and Regional Brain Atrophy in Older Adults.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2026Article
- Endurance training mitigates obesity-induced hippocampal impairment by enhancing neurotrophin signalling, synaptic plasticity, and cellular responses in a female rat model.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHippocampal atrophy is an established biomarker for conversion from the normal ageing process to developing cognitive impairment and dementia. This study used a novel hypothesis-free machine-learning approach, to uncover potential risk factors of lower hippocampal volume using information from the world's largest brain imaging study.
methodsA combination of machine learning and conventional statistical methods were used to identify predictors of low hippocampal volume. We run gradient boosting decision tree modelling including 2,891 input features measured before magnetic resonance imaging assessments (median 9.2 years, range 4.2-13.8 years) using data from 42,152 dementia-free UK Biobank participants. Logistic regression analyses were run on 87 factors identified as important for prediction based on Shapley values. False discovery rate-adjusted p value <0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.
resultsOlder age, male sex, greater height, and whole-body fat-free mass were the main predictors of low hippocampal volume with the model also identifying associations with lung function and lifestyle factors including smoking, physical activity, and coffee intake (corrected p < 0.05 for all). Red blood cell count and several red blood cell indices such as haemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, mean reticulocyte volume, mean sphered cell volume, and red blood cell distribution width were among many biomarkers associated with low hippocampal volume.
conclusionLifestyles, physical measures, and biomarkers may affect hippocampal volume, with many of the characteristics potentially reflecting oxygen supply to the brain. Further studies are required to establish causality and clinical relevance of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.