Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562249›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024

External Vs Internal e-Referrals: Results from a Nationwide Epidemiological Study Utilizing Secondary Collected Data.

Nawfal A Aljerian, Abdullah A Alharbi, Hani A Alghamdi, Meshary S Binhotan, Reem S AlOmar, Ali K Alsultan, Mohammed S Arafat, Abdulrahman Aldhabib, Mohammed K Alabdulaali

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nawfal A AljerianMedical Referrals Centre, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A AlharbiFamily and Community Medicine Department, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5405-2055
Hani A AlghamdiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5025-8136
Meshary S BinhotanEmergency Medical Services Department, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Reem S AlOmarDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4899-7965
Ali K AlsultanMedical Referrals Centre, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed S ArafatMedical Referrals Centre, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AldhabibMedical Referrals Centre, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed K AlabdulaaliMedical Referrals Centre, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ministry of Health · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAJazan University · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: E-referral systems, streamlining patient access to specialists, have gained global recognition yet lacked a comparative study between internal and external referrals in Saudi Arabia (KSA). Methods: This retrospective study utilized secondary data from the Saudi Medical Appointments and Referrals Centre system. The data covers 2020 and 2021, including socio-demographic data, referral characteristics, and specialties. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with external referrals. Results: Out of 645,425 e-referrals from more than 300 hospitals, 19.87% were external. The northern region led with 48.65%. Males were 55%, and those aged 25-64 were 56.68% of referrals. Outpatient clinic referrals comprised 47%, while 61% of referrals were due to a lack of specialty services. Several significant determinants are associated with higher rates of external referral with (p-value <0.001) and a 95% Confidence interval. Younger individuals under 25 exhibit higher referral rates than those aged 25-64. Geographically, compared to the central region, in descending order, there were increasing trends of external referral in the northern, western, and southern regions, respectively (OR = 19.26, OR = 4.48, OR 3.63). External referrals for outpatient departments (OPD) and dialysis services were higher than for routine admissions (OR = 1.38, OR = 1.26). The rate of external referrals due to the lack of available equipment was more predominant than other causes. Furthermore, in descending order, external referrals for organ transplantation and oncology are more frequent than for medical specialties, respectively (OR = 9.39, OR = 4.50). Conclusion: The study reveals trends in e-referrals within the KSA, noting regional differences, demographic factors, and types of specialties regarding external referrals, benefiting the New Model of Care for the 2030 Vision. Findings suggest expanding virtual consultations to reduce external referrals. Strengthening primary care and preventive medicine could also decrease future referrals. Future studies should assess resource distribution, including infrastructure and workforce, to further inform healthcare strategy.

Indexed as

epidemiologye-referralshealth policypublic health

Identifiers

PMID38562249
PMCPMC10984205
OpenAlexW4393281402

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.