Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38562707›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Subjective and Objective Measures of Cognitive Function are Correlated in Persons with Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Angela T H Kwan, Moiz Lakhani, Gia Han Le, Gurkaran Singh, Kayla M Teopiz, Felicia Ceban, Charnjit S Nijjar, Shakila Meshkat, Sebastian Badulescu, Roger Ho and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gia Han Le
Gurkaran Singh
Kayla M Teopiz
Felicia Ceban
Charnjit S Nijjar
Shakila Meshkat
Sebastian Badulescu
Roger Ho
Taeho Greg Rhee
Joshua D Di Vincenzo
Hartej Gill
Roger S McIntyre
Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAHologic (Germany) · DEMcMaster University · CAYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It remains unclear whether subjective and objective measures of cognitive function in Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC) are correlated. The extent of correlation has mechanistic and clinical implications. Methods: This post-hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial contains baseline data of subjective and objective measures of cognition in a rigorously characterized cohort living with PCC. Herein, we evaluated the association between subjective and objective condition function, as measured by the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire, 20-item (PDQ-20) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Trails Making Test (TMT)-A/B, respectively. Results: A total of 152 participants comprised the baseline sample. Due to missing data, our statistical analyses included 150 for self-reported PDQ-20, 147 individuals for combined DSST-measured cognitive function (composite z-score of the Pen/Paper plus Online CogState Version, Conclusions: Overall, a statistically significant correlation was observed between subjective and objective cognitive functions. Clinicians providing care for individuals with PCC who have subjective cognitive function complaints may consider taking a measurement-based approach to cognition at the point of care that focuses exclusively on patient-reported measures.

Identifiers

PMID38562707
PMCPMC10984052
OpenAlexW4393032439

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.