Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38564604›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effectiveness of stabilization methods for the immediate and short-term preservation of bovine fecal and upper respiratory tract genomic DNA.

Lee J Pinnell, Cory A Wolfe, Jake Castle, William B Crosby, Enrique Doster, Paul S Morley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lee J PinnellVeterinary Education, Research and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-3313
Cory A WolfeVeterinary Education, Research and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States of America.
Jake CastleVeterinary Education, Research and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States of America.
William B CrosbyDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi State, United States of America.
Enrique DosterVeterinary Education, Research and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States of America.
Paul S MorleyVeterinary Education, Research and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States of America.
West Texas A&M University · USMississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research on stabilization methods for microbiome investigations has largely focused on human fecal samples. There are a few studies using feces from other species, but no published studies investigating preservation of samples collected from cattle. Given that microbial taxa are differentially impacted during storage it is warranted to study impacts of preservation methods on microbial communities found in samples outside of human fecal samples. Here we tested methods of preserving bovine fecal respiratory specimens for up to 2 weeks at four temperatures (room temperature, 4°C, -20°C, and -80°C) by comparing microbial diversity and community composition to samples extracted immediately after collection. Importantly, fecal specimens preserved and analyzed were technical replicates, providing a look at the effects of preservation method in the absence of biological variation. We found that preservation with the OMNIgene®•GUT kit resulted in community structure most like that of fresh samples extracted immediately, even when stored at room temperature (~20°C). Samples that were flash-frozen without added preservation solution were the next most representative of original communities, while samples preserved with ethanol were the least representative. These results contradict previous reports that ethanol is effective in preserving fecal communities and suggest for studies investigating cattle either flash-freezing of samples without preservative or preservation with OMNIgene®•GUT will yield more representative microbial communities.

Indexed as

DNASpecimen HandlingAnimalsCattleEthanolFecesGenomicsHumansRespiratory SystemRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNAEthanolRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38564604
PMCPMC10987004
OpenAlexW4393407697

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.