Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565609›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Feeding Drosophila gut microbiomes from young and old flies modifies the microbiome.

Jonas Bruhn Wesseltoft, Christian Dupont Danielsen, Andreas Mølgaard Andersen, Nadieh de Jonge, Anders Olsen, Palle Duun Rohde, Torsten Nygaard Kristensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effect of microbiome on social spacing inmicroPublication biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonas Bruhn WesseltoftDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. jlw@bio.aau.dk.
Christian Dupont DanielsenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Andreas Mølgaard AndersenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Nadieh de JongeDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anders OlsenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Palle Duun RohdeDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Torsten Nygaard KristensenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DK

Funding

Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond DFF-2032-00205AVillum Fonden 40841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly evident that the myriad of microbes in the gut, within cells and attached to body parts (or roots of plants), play crucial roles for the host. Although this has been known for decades, recent developments in molecular biology allow for expanded insight into the abundance and function of these microbes. Here we used the vinegar fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to investigate fitness measures across the lifetime of flies fed a suspension of gut microbes harvested from young or old flies, respectively. Our hypothesis was that flies constitutively enriched with a 'Young microbiome' would live longer and be more agile at old age (i.e. have increased healthspan) compared to flies enriched with an 'Old microbiome'. Three major take home messages came out of our study: (1) the gut microbiomes of young and old flies differ markedly; (2) feeding flies with Young and Old microbiomes altered the microbiome of recipient flies and (3) the two different microbial diets did not have any effect on locomotor activity nor lifespan of the recipient flies, contradicting our working hypothesis. Combined, these results provide novel insight into the interplay between hosts and their microbiomes and clearly highlight that the phenotypic effects of gut transplants and probiotics can be complex and unpredictable.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterLongevity

Identifiers

PMID38565609
PMCPMC10987527
OpenAlexW4393565552

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.