Correction to: Development of the Italian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome: design and methodological aspects.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. Effectiveness of most common adjuvant wound treatments (skin substitutes, negative pressure wound therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, platelet-rich plasma/fibrin, and growth factors) for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome.Acta diabetologica · 2025
   Pooled it
2. Effectiveness of most common adjuvant wound treatments (skin substitutes, negative pressure wound therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, platelet-rich plasma/fibrin, and growth factors) for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome.Acta diabetologica · 2025
   Pooled it
3. Effectiveness of different advanced wound dressings versus standard of care for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.Acta diabetologica · 2024
   Pooled it
4. Effectiveness of different advanced wound dressings versus standard of care for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.Acta diabetologica · 2024
   Pooled it
5. Prevention of foot ulcers recurrence in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.Acta diabetologica · 2024
   Pooled it
6. The future approach for the management of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Development of the Italian clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome: design and methodological aspects.2023

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.