ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024
Real-world persistence of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment persistence in paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: A Swedish nationwide registry study.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026Article
- International Expert Opinion on Optimal Switching to Cladribine Tablets from Other High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Opportunities and Challenges.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Insights into adherence to cladribine tablets in the real world in multiple countries: results from patient support programs.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Did COVID-19 Pandemic Change the Course of Multiple Sclerosis? A Retrospective Eight-Year Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Treatment Adherence in MS: Does Objective MS Knowledge and MS Risk Knowledge Matter in Relation to Perceived Disease-Modifying Therapy Benefits?Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Age-related differences in switching highly effective disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Persistence to Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis: Results from the German NeuroTransData Registry.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- De-escalating and discontinuing disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Real-world persistence of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Hyperresponsiveness of Corticoid-Resistant Th17/Tc-17 Cells to TLR-2 and TLR-4 Ligands is a Feature of Multiple Sclerosis Patients at Higher Risk of Therapy Failure.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Predictors of initiating high-efficacy vs. platform therapies as first-line disease-modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTreatment persistence is the continuation of therapy over time. It reflects a combination of treatment efficacy and tolerability. We aimed to describe real-world rates of persistence on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and reasons for DMT discontinuation.
methodsTreatment data on 4366 consecutive people with relapse-onset multiple sclerosis (MS) were pooled from 13 UK specialist centres during 2021. Inclusion criteria were exposure to at least one MS DMT and a complete history of DMT prescribing. PwMS in blinded clinical trials were excluded. Data collected included sex, age at MS onset, age at DMT initiation, DMT treatment dates, and reasons for stopping or switching DMT. For pwMS who had received immune reconstituting therapies (cladribine/alemtuzumab), discontinuation date was defined as starting an alternative DMT. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to express DMT persistence.
resultsIn 6997 treatment events (1.6 per person with MS), median time spent on any single maintenance DMT was 4.3 years (95% confidence interval = 4.1-4.5 years). The commonest overall reasons for DMT discontinuation were adverse events (35.0%) and lack of efficacy (30.3%). After 10 years, 20% of people treated with alemtuzumab had received another subsequent DMT, compared to 82% of people treated with interferon or glatiramer acetate.
conclusionsImmune reconstituting DMTs may have the highest potential to offer a single treatment for relapsing MS. Comparative data on DMT persistence and reasons for discontinuation are valuable to inform treatment decisions and in personalizing treatment in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.