Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38569055›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2024

Association Between Treatment Adherence and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Outcomes in People With Diabetes Using Smart Insulin Pens in a Real-World Setting.

Thomas P A Danne, Michael Joubert, Niels Væver Hartvig, Anne Kaas, Nikoline Nygård Knudsen, Julia K Mader

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Diabetes technology (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Insulin Injection Behaviors and Association with Glycemic Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes: A Real-World Survey in Spain.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Insights into the effective use of the Smart MDI system: Data from the first 1852 type 1 diabetes users.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas P A DanneDiabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Children's and Youth Hospital Auf der Bult, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-6961
Michael JoubertDiabetes Care Unit, Caen University Hospital, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8731-7355
Niels Væver HartvigNovo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4769-9061
Anne KaasNovo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.
Nikoline Nygård KnudsenNovo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5879-7153
Julia K MaderDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-4233
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKKinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult · DEMedical University of Graz · ATUniversité de Caen Normandie · FR

Funding

Novo Nordisk A/S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the association of insulin injection adherence, smart insulin pen engagement, and glycemic control using real-world data from 16 countries from adults self-administering basal insulin degludec and bolus insulin with a smart insulin pen (NovoPen 6 or NovoPen Echo Plus) alongside continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsData were aggregated over 14-day periods. Treatment adherence was defined according to the number of missed basal and missed bolus insulin doses and smart pen engagement according to the number of days with data uploads.

resultsData from 3,945 adults, including 25,157 14-day periods with ≥70% CGM coverage, were analyzed. On average, 0.2 basal and 6.0 bolus insulin doses were missed over 14 days. The estimated probability of missing at least one basal insulin dose over a 14-day period was 17.6% (95% CI 16.5, 18.7). Missing one basal or bolus insulin dose per 14 days was associated with a significant decrease in percentage of time with glucose levels in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L), of -2.8% (95% CI -3.7, -1.8) and -1.7% (-1.8, -1.6), respectively; therefore, missing two basal or four bolus doses would decrease TIR by >5%. Smart pen engagement was associated positively with glycemic outcomes.

conclusionsThis combined analysis of real-world smart pen and CGM data showed that missing two basal or four bolus insulin doses over a 14-day period would be associated with a clinically relevant decrease in TIR. Smart insulin pens provide valuable insights into treatment injection behaviors.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAdultAgedContinuous Glucose MonitoringDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansInsulin, Long-ActingMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Adherence and ComplianceBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin, Long-Acting

Identifiers

PMID38569055
PMCPMC11116913
OpenAlexW4393853146

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.