Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38569618›Full record

ArticleInternational neurourology journal2024

Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Based on A Nonlinear Transformation Stacking Learning Strategy.

Xinyu Cao, Yin Fang, Chunguang Yang, Zhenghao Liu, Guoping Xu, Yan Jiang, Peiyan Wu, Wenbo Song, Hanshuo Xing, Xinglong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International neurourology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinyu CaoSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yin FangSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chunguang YangDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhenghao LiuDepartment of Urology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Guoping XuSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yan JiangSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Peiyan WuSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wenbo SongSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hanshuo XingSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xinglong WuSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

Wuhan Institute of Technology CX2022330Wuhan Institute of Technology CX2022334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate cancer (PCa) is an epithelial malignancy that originates in the prostate gland and is generally categorized into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups. The primary diagnostic indicator for PCa is the measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. However, reliance on PSA levels can result in false positives, leading to unnecessary biopsies and an increased risk of invasive injuries. Therefore, it is imperative to develop an efficient and accurate method for PCa risk stratification. Many recent studies on PCa risk stratification based on clinical data have employed a binary classification, distinguishing between low to intermediate and high risk. In this paper, we propose a novel machine learning (ML) approach utilizing a stacking learning strategy for predicting the tripartite risk stratification of PCa.

methodsClinical records, featuring attributes selected using the lasso method, were utilized with 5 ML classifiers. The outputs of these classifiers underwent transformation by various nonlinear transformers and were then concatenated with the lasso-selected features, resulting in a set of new features. A stacking learning strategy, integrating different ML classifiers, was developed based on these new features.

resultsOur proposed approach demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.83 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.88 in a dataset comprising 197 PCa patients with 42 clinical characteristics.

conclusionThis study aimed to improve clinicians' ability to rapidly assess PCa risk stratification while reducing the burden on patients. This was achieved by using artificial intelligence-related technologies as an auxiliary method for diagnosing PCa.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningProstatic neoplasmsRisk stratificationStacking learning

Identifiers

PMID38569618
PMCPMC10990759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.