Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38574166›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Serological diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth (Ascaris, Trichuris and hookworm) infections: A scoping review.

Sara Roose, Fiona Vande Velde, Johnny Vlaminck, Peter Geldhof, Bruno Levecke

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Paired-Marker Framework for Interpreting Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparative evaluation of Midi ParasepParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara RooseDepartment of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0072-9649
Fiona Vande VeldeDepartment of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Johnny VlaminckDepartment of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Peter GeldhofDepartment of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Bruno LeveckeDepartment of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

Coordination ActionFundamental Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization emphasizes the importance of integrated monitoring and evaluation in neglected tropical disease (NTD) control programs. Serological assays offer a potential solution for integrated diagnosis of NTDs, particularly for those requiring mass drug administration (MDA) as primary control and elimination strategy. This scoping review aims (i) to provide an overview of assays using serum or plasma to detect infections with soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) in both humans and animals, (ii) to examine the methodologies used in this research field and (iii) to discuss advancements in serological diagnosis of STHs to guide prevention and control programs in veterinary and human medicine. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a systematic search in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, supplemented by a Google search using predefined keywords to identify commercially available serological assays. Additionally, we performed a patent search through Espacenet. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe identified 85 relevant literature records spanning over 50 years, with a notable increased interest in serological assay development in recent years. Most of the research efforts concentrated on diagnosing Ascaris infections in both humans and pigs, primarily using ELISA and western blot technologies. Almost all records targeted antibodies as analytes, employing proteins and peptides as analyte detection agents. Approximately 60% of sample sets described pertained to human samples. No commercially available tests for Trichuris or hookworms were identified, while for Ascaris, there are at least seven different ELISAs on the market.

conclusionsWhile a substantial number of assays are employed in epidemiological research, the current state of serological diagnosis for guiding STH prevention and control programs is limited. Only two assays designed for pigs are used to inform efficient deworming practices in pig populations. Regarding human diagnosis, none of the existing assays has undergone extensive large-scale validation or integration into routine diagnostics for MDA programs.

Indexed as

Serologic TestsSoilTrichurisAncylostomatoideaAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAscariasisAscarisHelminthiasisHookworm InfectionsHumansTrichuriasisAntibodies, HelminthSoil

Identifiers

PMID38574166
PMCPMC10994556
OpenAlexW4393952054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.