Evidence mapPaperPMID 38575770Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2024

A new era in the science and care of kidney diseases.

Carmine Zoccali, Francesca Mallamaci, Liz Lightstone, Vivek Jha, Carol Pollock, Katherine Tuttle, Peter Kotanko, Andrzej Wiecek, Hans Joachim Anders, Giuseppe Remuzzi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Rewiring the mitochondrial NADMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The role of extracellular vesicles in kidney disease progression.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Effective and new technologies in kidney tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carmine ZoccaliKidney Research Institute, New York City, NY, USA. carmine.zoccali@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-1996
Francesca MallamaciNephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit Azienda Ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Liz LightstoneDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vivek JhaGeorge Institute for Global Health, UNSW, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8015-9470
Carol PollockKolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-6495
Katherine TuttleProvidence Medical Research Center, Providence Inland Northwest, Spokane, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-0103
Peter KotankoKidney Research Institute, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4373-412X
Andrzej WiecekDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, 40-027, Katowice, Poland.
Hans Joachim AndersDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine IV, Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Giuseppe RemuzziIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCSS, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6194-3446
Kamyar Kalantar-ZadehHarold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, California, USA.
Adeera LevinUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Division of Nephrology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-8401
Raymond VanholderEuropean Kidney Health Alliance, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2633-1636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Notable progress in basic, translational and clinical nephrology research has been made over the past five decades. Nonetheless, many challenges remain, including obstacles to the early detection of kidney disease, disparities in access to care and variability in responses to existing and emerging therapies. Innovations in drug development, research technologies, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Exciting prospects include the availability of new drugs to slow or halt the progression of chronic kidney disease, the development of bioartificial kidneys that mimic healthy kidney functions, and tissue engineering techniques that could enable transplantable kidneys to be created from the cells of the recipient, removing the risk of rejection. Cell and gene therapies have the potential to be applied for kidney tissue regeneration and repair. In addition, about 30% of kidney disease cases are monogenic and could potentially be treated using these genetic medicine approaches. Systemic diseases that involve the kidney, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, might also be amenable to these treatments. Continued investment, communication, collaboration and translation of innovations are crucial to realize their full potential. In addition, increasing sophistication in exploring large datasets, implementation science, and qualitative methodologies will improve the ability to deliver transformational kidney health strategies.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesGenetic TherapyHumansNephrologyRegenerative MedicineTissue Engineering

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.