Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38577345›Full record

ArticleHardwareX2024

Modification of a desktop FFF printer via NIR laser addition for upconversion 3D printing.

Adilet Zhakeyev, Rohith Devanathan, Jose Marques-Hueso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HardwareX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adilet ZhakeyevInstitute of Sensors, Signals and Systems, Heriot-Watt University, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rohith DevanathanInstitute of Sensors, Signals and Systems, Heriot-Watt University, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jose Marques-HuesoInstitute of Sensors, Signals and Systems, Heriot-Watt University, EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional photopolymer-based 3D printing methods require sequential printing of thin layers, due to short penetration depths of UV or blue light sources used by these techniques. In contrast, upconversion 3D printing circumvents the layer-by-layer limitation by taking advantage of upconversion luminescence processes and the high penetration depths offered by near-infrared (NIR) lasers, allowing for selective crosslinking of voxels at any depth or position within the resin container. The implementation of this technique required the construction of a 3D printer with the ability of focusing the laser on any point of the space. For this, a low-cost fused filament fabrication (FFF) printer was modified by incorporating a 980 nm laser and laser control circuit. The total cost of the parts required for modification was £180. With enhanced penetration depths up to 5.8 cm, this method also allows for printing inside or through existing 3D printed parts. This opens doors for restoration of broken items, in situ bioprinting, 3D-circuitry, and notably, 3D printing inside cavities of a different material, illustrating numerous opportunities for practical applications.

Indexed as

FFF printer modificationNIR laser stereolithographyUpconversion 3D printing

Identifiers

PMID38577345
PMCPMC10990731

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.