ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024
Predicting responses to omalizumab in antihistamine-refractory chronic urticaria: A real-world longitudinal study.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting immune dysregulation in chronic spontaneous urticaria: beyond antihistamines.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Immunological Basis of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Immunoglobulin E and Beyond.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Review
- Differential MicroRNA Expression in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Relation to Treatment Response.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
- Treatment Approaches for Omalizumab-Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Cytokine imbalance and immune network endotypes underlying heterogeneous response to omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Influence of genetic polymorphisms on omalizumab clinical response in pediatric severe asthma: a pilot study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Predictors of early treatment response to antihistamines and omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
- Total IgE Trends in Children with Allergic Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treating chronic urticaria (CU) that is unresponsive to H1-antihistamines (H1AHs) is challenging, and the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab remains unclear. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab, optimal response assessment timing, and predictive factors. Methods: Initially, 5535 patients with CU who were receiving at least 20 mg of loratadine daily for at least 6 months (January 2007-August 2021) were screened. Ultimately, 386 patients who had been receiving omalizumab add-on treatment for >6 months were followed-up for more than 2 years. Predictors of treatment response to omalizumab add-on therapy for patients with antihistamine-refractory CU were identified by using a generalized linear model. Results: In our retrospective cohort, omalizumab treatment showed cumulative response rates of 55.2% at 3 months, 71.0% at 6 months, and 81.4% at 9 months for patients with H1AH-refractory CU. Analysis of longitudinal responses to omalizumab treatment revealed 3 distinct clusters: favorable (cluster 1 [n = 158]), intermediate (cluster 2 [n =1 43]), and poor responses (cluster 3 [n = 85]). Subjects were categorized on the basis of whether they had achieved a complete response within 3 months; 213 early responders, 117 late responders, and 56 nonresponders were identified. The initial dose of omalizumab differed significantly among the 3 clusters. Low total IgE level (<40 kU/L) predicted nonresponse (odds ratio [OR] = 3.10 [ Conclusion: Real-world data reveal 3 distinct clusters for response to omalizumab treatment; confirm low serum total IgE level (<40 kU/L) as a predictor of nonresponse; and identify potential biomarkers, including IgE level, basophil count, and PLR, for early responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.