ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhancing fracture diagnosis in pelvic X-rays by deep convolutional neural network with synthesized images from 3D-CT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the pelvic ring: benchmarking multi-bone segmentation for ROI-Guided fracture detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pelvic Fracture Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- AI-driven Technologies for Wrist Fracture Prediction: A Narrative Review of Emerging Approaches.Journal of wrist surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Interpretable Severity Scoring of Pelvic Trauma Through Automated Fracture Detection and Bayesian Inference.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis.Current medical science · 2024Review
- Deep learning techniques for Alzheimer's disease detection in 3D imaging: A systematic review.Health science reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pelvic fractures pose significant challenges in medical diagnosis due to the complex structure of the pelvic bones. Timely diagnosis of pelvic fractures is critical to reduce complications and mortality rates. While computed tomography (CT) is highly accurate in detecting pelvic fractures, the initial diagnostic procedure usually involves pelvic X-rays (PXR). In recent years, many deep learning-based methods have been developed utilizing ImageNet-based transfer learning for diagnosing hip and pelvic fractures. However, the ImageNet dataset contains natural RGB images which are different than PXR. In this study, we proposed a two-step transfer learning approach that improved the diagnosis of pelvic fractures in PXR images. The first step involved training a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) using synthesized PXR images derived from 3D-CT by digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR). In the second step, the classification layers of the DCNN were fine-tuned using acquired PXR images. The performance of the proposed method was compared with the conventional ImageNet-based transfer learning method. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed DRR-based method, using 20 synthesized PXR images for each CT, achieved superior performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of 0.9327 and 0.8014 for visible and invisible fractures, respectively. The ImageNet-based method yields AUROCs of 0.8908 and 0.7308 for visible and invisible fractures, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.