ArticleMolecular biotechnology2025
The Predictive Value of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Related Risk Score in Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment of Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions between neutrophil extracellular traps and macrophages: the key to inflammatory diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Exploring the role of neutrophil extracellular traps in colorectal cancer: Insights from single-cell sequencing.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in tumor progression of gynecologic cancers.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has brought great healthy burden for patients. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been explored in several tumors, while it remains largely unclear in CRC. CRC-related data were downloaded from Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases. Then, a NET risk score was built after univariate Cox and LASSO Cox regression analysis. Prognostic value was evaluated via survival analysis, stratification analysis, and ROC analysis. The functional enrichment analysis was conducted basing on bulk and scRNA-seq data. The immune landscape difference was analyzed using CIBERSORT, XCell, and MCPcounter portals. NET risk score was built for CRC patients, basing on G0S2, HIST1H2BC, CRISPLD2, and IL17A. In TCGA-CRC and validation datasets, regardless of age or gender, high-risk CRC patients had significantly worse prognosis, besides higher NET risk score was mainly found in samples with MSI-H and advanced T, N, and M stages. Employing multiple databases, we noticed that M0 and M2 Macrophages infiltrated the most in high-risk CRC patients, besides M2 Macrophages and neutrophils showed positive correlation with NET risk score. A novel reliable prognostic NET risk score was developed for CRC patients, and high-risk patients had unfavorable prognosis with advanced disease status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38580851What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.