Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024
Efficacy and safety of a four-drug, quarter-dose treatment for hypertension: the QUARTET USA randomized trial.
Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Ultra-low-dose Treatment for Hypertension (QUARTET USA)
Effects of Manually Recorded or Automatically Transmitted Home Blood Pressures With or Without Automated Patient Feedback on Hypertension Care
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- "Efficacy and safety of low-dose combination (Quad pill and Triple pill) therapy versus standard of care and placebo in controlling hypertension: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials".Journal of human hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled randomised QUARTET trials assessing effectiveness of a single pill for hypertension.Open heart · 2025Trial
- Single-pill combination therapy for blood-pressure lowering: clinical and implementation differences between the United States and Nigeria.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Review
- Medication Non-Adherence in Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Drivers, and Practical Solutions.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Triple drug antihypertensive single-pill combinations included as WHO essential medicines: an overview of efficacy, safety, and cost.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Review
- Personalised Approach to the Management of Older People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus-A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Novel pharmacological approaches to lowering blood pressure and managing hypertension.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Low-Dose Combinations With 3 or 4 Blood Pressure-Lowering Medications for the Treatment of Hypertension.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Maximizing blood pressure lowering effects: a review of drug class comparisons and rationale for combination approaches.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Going beyond the technology: Considerations in translating electronic case report forms.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Review
- Examining the impact of the QUARTET USA trial using the translational science benefits model.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Race, ethnicity, and considerations for data collection and analysis in research studies.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New approaches are needed to lower blood pressure (BP) given persistently low control rates. QUARTET USA sought to evaluate the effect of four-drug, quarter-dose BP lowering combination in patients with hypertension. QUARTET USA was a randomized (1:1), double-blinded trial conducted in federally qualified health centers among adults with hypertension. Participants received either a quadpill of candesartan 2 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg or candesartan 8 mg for 12 weeks. If BP was >130/>80 mm Hg at 6 weeks in either arm, then participants received open label add-on amlodipine 5 mg. The primary outcome was mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 weeks, controlling for baseline BP. Secondary outcomes included mean change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and safety included serious adverse events, relevant adverse drug effects, and electrolyte abnormalities. Among 62 participants randomized between August 2019-May 2022 (n = 32 intervention, n = 30 control), mean (SD) age was 52 (11.5) years, 45% were female, 73% identified as Hispanic, and 18% identified as Black. Baseline mean (SD) SBP was 138.1 (11.2) mmHg, and baseline mean (SD) DBP was 84.3 (10.5) mmHg. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in SBP (-4.8 mm Hg [95% CI: -10.8, 1.3, p = 0.123] and a -4.9 mmHg (95% CI: -8.6, -1.3, p = 0.009) greater mean DBP change in the intervention arm compared with the control arm at 12 weeks. Adverse events did not differ significantly between arms. The quadpill had a similar SBP and greater DBP lowering effect compared with candesartan 8 mg. Trial registration number: NCT03640312.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.