Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38584159›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024

Efficacy and safety of a four-drug, quarter-dose treatment for hypertension: the QUARTET USA randomized trial.

Mark D Huffman, Abigail S Baldridge, Danielle Lazar, Hiba Abbas, Jairo Mejia, Fallon M Flowers, Adriana Quintana, Alema Jackson, Namratha R Kandula, Donald M Lloyd-Jones and 8 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03640312 phase2completednot on this map

A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Quadruple Ultra-low-dose Treatment for Hypertension (QUARTET USA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2019 to 2024Enrolled62ConditionsHypertensionArmsQUARTET LDQT, Candesartan
NCT07397260 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Manually Recorded or Automatically Transmitted Home Blood Pressures With or Without Automated Patient Feedback on Hypertension Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,304ConditionsHypertension (HTN)ArmsSelf report of home measured blood pressure via patient EHR portal, Automated feedback about home blood pressure results, Automated Transmission of Remotely Measured Blood Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mark D HuffmanCardiovascular Division and Global Health Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. m.huffman@wustl.edu.
Abigail S BaldridgeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Danielle LazarAccess Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hiba AbbasAccess Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jairo MejiaAccess Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
Fallon M FlowersAccess Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
Adriana QuintanaAccess Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alema JacksonAccess Community Health Network, Chicago, IL, USA.
Namratha R KandulaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Donald M Lloyd-JonesDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Stephen D PersellDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sadiya S KhanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
James J PaparelloDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aashima ChopraDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Priya TripathiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
My H VuDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clara K ChowWestmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Jody D CiolinoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MILDA Renne SAUNDERS · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
A double-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a quadruple ultra-low-dose treatment for hypertension (QUARTET USA)R33HL139852 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CIOLINO, JODY D., HUFFMAN, MARK D · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL139852NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New approaches are needed to lower blood pressure (BP) given persistently low control rates. QUARTET USA sought to evaluate the effect of four-drug, quarter-dose BP lowering combination in patients with hypertension. QUARTET USA was a randomized (1:1), double-blinded trial conducted in federally qualified health centers among adults with hypertension. Participants received either a quadpill of candesartan 2 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg or candesartan 8 mg for 12 weeks. If BP was >130/>80 mm Hg at 6 weeks in either arm, then participants received open label add-on amlodipine 5 mg. The primary outcome was mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 weeks, controlling for baseline BP. Secondary outcomes included mean change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and safety included serious adverse events, relevant adverse drug effects, and electrolyte abnormalities. Among 62 participants randomized between August 2019-May 2022 (n = 32 intervention, n = 30 control), mean (SD) age was 52 (11.5) years, 45% were female, 73% identified as Hispanic, and 18% identified as Black. Baseline mean (SD) SBP was 138.1 (11.2) mmHg, and baseline mean (SD) DBP was 84.3 (10.5) mmHg. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in SBP (-4.8 mm Hg [95% CI: -10.8, 1.3, p = 0.123] and a -4.9 mmHg (95% CI: -8.6, -1.3, p = 0.009) greater mean DBP change in the intervention arm compared with the control arm at 12 weeks. Adverse events did not differ significantly between arms. The quadpill had a similar SBP and greater DBP lowering effect compared with candesartan 8 mg. Trial registration number: NCT03640312.

Indexed as

AmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsBisoprololBlood PressureHypertensionTetrazolesAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIndapamideMaleAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsBisoprololcandesartanIndapamideTetrazolesFederally qualified health centersHypertensionQuadpillRandomized trialSingle pill combination

Identifiers

PMID38584159
PMCPMC11150153

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.