ArticleProceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data2023
Private Continuous Survival Analysis with Distributed Multi-Site Data.
Article in Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating covariate-balanced survival curve in distributed data environment using data collaboration quasi-experiment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Collaborative Inference for Accelerated Failure Time Model Using Clinical Center-Level Summary Statistics.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective disease surveillance systems require large-scale epidemiological data to improve health outcomes and quality of care for the general population. As data may be limited within a single site, multi-site data (e.g., from a number of local/regional health systems) need to be considered. Leveraging distributed data across multiple sites for epidemiological analysis poses significant challenges. Due to the sensitive nature of epidemiological data, it is imperative to design distributed solutions that provide strong privacy protections. Current privacy solutions often assume a central site, which is responsible for aggregating the distributed data and applying privacy protection before sharing the results (e.g., aggregation via secure primitives and differential privacy for sharing aggregate results). However, identifying such a central site may be difficult in practice and relying on a central site may introduce potential vulnerabilities (e.g., single point of failure). Furthermore, to support clinical interventions and inform policy decisions in a timely manner, epidemiological analysis need to reflect dynamic changes in the data. Yet, existing distributed privacy-protecting approaches were largely designed for static data (e.g., one-time data sharing) and cannot fulfill dynamic data requirements. In this work, we propose a privacy-protecting approach that supports the sharing of dynamic epidemiological analysis and provides strong privacy protection in a decentralized manner. We apply our solution in continuous survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier estimation model while providing differential privacy protection. Our evaluations on a real dataset containing COVID-19 cases show that our method provides highly usable results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.