Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38587601›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2024

Patient perspectives on pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing for antidepressant prescribing in primary care: a qualitative description study.

Alexandra Cernat, Zainab Samaan, Julia Abelson, Amanada Ramdyal, Hadia Shaikh, Meredith Vanstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra CernatDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6007-7825
Zainab SamaanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5974-9361
Julia AbelsonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-2783
Amanada RamdyalDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3162-4871
Hadia ShaikhDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada.
Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada. meredith.vanstone@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6259

Funding

Canada Research Chairs Ethical Complexity in Primary CareCIHR Vanier Canada Graduate ScholarshipMcMaster University Department of Family Medicine Pilot Project Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) try multiple antidepressants before finding one that works well and is tolerable. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing was developed to facilitate more efficacious prescribing. This technology has not been robustly implemented clinically. Patient perspectives are critical to policy decisions, but the views of patients with MDD about the use of PGx testing to guide antidepressant prescribing have not been extensively examined, particularly in publicly funded healthcare systems. The purpose of this qualitative description study was to produce actionable patient perspectives evidence to inform future technology assessment of PGx testing. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 adults with MDD for which antidepressants were indicated in Ontario, Canada, and used the Ontario Decision Determinants Framework to conduct an unconstrained deductive content analysis. Patients expressed views about the overall clinical benefit of PGx testing in depression care, preferences for deployment of testing, perspectives on ethical considerations, opinions about equity and patient care, and beliefs regarding the feasibility of adopting PGx testing into the healthcare system. They also worried about the possibility of conflicts of interest between PGx test manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies. This study provides policymakers with patient priorities to facilitate the development of patient-centred policies. It highlights that formal adoption of PGx testing into the healthcare system requires a focus on equity of access and health outcomes.

Indexed as

Genetic testingMajor depressive disorderPatient perspectivesPharmacogenomicsPrimary careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38587601
PMCPMC11217204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.