ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Differences in the prevalence of NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD according to changes in the nomenclature in a health check-up using MRI-derived proton density fat fraction.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Distinct Laboratory and Clinical Features of Metabolic and Alcohol-Related Liver Disease (MetALD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current obesity reports · 2026Pooled it
- Brazilian Green Propolis and Essential Oil Residues Improve Metabolic Dysfunction by Modulating Key Hepatic Lipogenic Genes in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Beyond radiation dosimetry: metabolic burden and a possible healthy worker survivor pattern in the medical imaging workforce.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Comparison of prevalence of fatty liver disease according to the different nomenclatures of NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD in a large Iranian Population-based study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flexible Parametric Survival Modeling of Transaminases as Predictive Biomarkers for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study (2012-2022).International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- KASL clinical practice guidelines for the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease 2025.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Vendor-Independent Software Tools for Liver Proton Density Fat Fraction Estimation at 1.5 T.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Unmet needs of metabolic dysfunction - Associated "fatty or steatotic" liver disease.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInternational expert panels proposed new nomenclatures, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in 2020 and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in 2023, along with revised diagnostic criteria to replace non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to investigate the differences in NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD prevalence with changing nomenclature in a health check-up using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) to assess hepatic steatosis. We also examined the prevalence of the sub-classifications of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and the differences in characteristics among the sub-categories.
methodsWe included 844 participants who underwent liver MRI-PDFF at our health check-up clinic between January 2020 and November 2022. Hepatic steatosis was defined as MRI-PDFF ≥ 5%. Participants were categorized according to NAFLD, MAFLD, MASLD, and sub-classifications of SLD.
resultsThe prevalence rates of NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD were 25.9%, 29.5%, and 25.2%, respectively. 30.5% of the participants was categorized as SLD. The prevalence rates of the SLD sub-categories were 25.2% for MASLD, 3.7% for MASLD and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), 0.1% for alcohol-associated liver disease, 1.3% for specific etiology SLD, and 0.1% for cryptogenic SLD. Compared with patients in the MASLD group, those in the MetALD group were younger, predominantly male, and exhibited higher levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and triglycerides.
conclusionThe prevalences of NAFLD and MASLD assessed using MRI-PDFF were similar, with MASLD accounting for 97.3% of the patients with NAFLD. The separate MetALD sub-category may have clinical characteristics that differ from those of MASLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38587630What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.