ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Dubuisson Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension with Laparoscopic Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Short-Term Results.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Lateral suspension vs. sacral colpopexy for treating pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension, Pectopexy and Sacrocolpopexy for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Propensity-Weighted Retrospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Hysterectomy with Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Native Tissue Repair for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Versus Sacrocolpopexy: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Median 50-Month Patient-Reported and 14-Month Anatomical Outcomes.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse with an Emphasis on the Central Compartment: From Genetic Risk Factors and Biomarkers to Contemporary Sacropexy and Emerging Robotic Innovations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A novel description of dynamic organ-specific trajectories in pelvic organ prolapse based on magnetic resonance imaging traces.BMC medical imaging · 2026Observational
- Interpreting Mid-Term LAWS versus Sacrocolpopexy Outcomes in Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse [Letter].International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- vNOTES high uterosacral ligament suspension versus laparoscopic lateral suspension in the management of vaginal vault prolapse: initial experience in a single tertiary center.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Unilateral pectineal suspension with mesh as a rescue procedure when sacrocolpopexy is not feasible: a case series.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- A Cohort-Based Comparative Study of Three Minimally Invasive Apical Prolapse Surgeries: Sacropexy, Pectopexy, and Lateral Suspension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP): Update and Systematic Review of Prospective and Randomised Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and high uterosacral ligament suspension for apical prolapse: a retrospective clinical study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial for Laparoscopic Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Sacropexy vs. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic lateral suspension combined with uterosacral ligament folding and shortening versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- The standardized procedure, technical key points and latest progress of laparoscopic lateral suspension surgery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Role of lateral suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a Delphi survey of expert panel.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Comparison of sexual function between laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with the use of the PISQ-IR questionnaire.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Fascial fixation versus non-fixation in vNOTES lateral suspension after vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is the gold standard for the treatment of apical prolapse, although dissection of the promontory may be challenging. Laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) with mesh is an alternative technique for apical repair with similar anatomical and functional outcomes, according to recent studies. The purpose of this study was to compare these operative techniques.
methodsWomen with uterine Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage 2 were enrolled in this prospective study and were randomly allocated to the LLS or LSC group. At the 12-month follow-up, primary measures included both anatomical and functional outcomes. Perioperative parameters and complications were recorded.
resultsA total of 93 women were randomized, 48 in the LLS group and 45 in the LSC group, with 2 women lost to follow-up in both groups. LSC anatomic success rates were 81.82% for the apical compartment and 95.22% for the anterior compartment. LLS anatomic success rates for the apical and anterior compartments were 90% and 92.30%, respectively. The mean operative time for LLS was 160.3 min, while for LSC it was 168.3 min. The mean blood loss was 100 mL in both procedures. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in three women. Mesh erosion was not observed in any of the cases. In terms of the complication, Clavien-Dindo grade 1 was observed in two patients in the LLS group and a complication rated grade 3b was observed in one patient in LSC group.
conclusionsLLS is a good alternative to LSC, with promising anatomical and quality-of-life results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.