Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38593494›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2024

Stimulus shapes strategy: Effects of stimulus characteristics and individual differences in academic achievement on the neural mechanisms engaged during the N-back task.

Daniel R Leopold, Hyojeong Kim, Kenneth W Carlson, Mikaela A Rowe, Boman R Groff, Moriah P Major, Erik G Willcutt, Laurie E Cutting, Marie T Banich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel R LeopoldUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Cognitive Science, USA.
Hyojeong KimUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Cognitive Science, USA.
Kenneth W CarlsonUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Cognitive Science, USA.
Mikaela A RoweUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, USA.
Boman R GroffUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Cognitive Science, USA; University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, USA.
Moriah P MajorUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Cognitive Science, USA.
Erik G WillcuttUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, USA; University of Colorado Boulder, Institute for Behavioral Genetics, USA.
Laurie E CuttingVanderbilt University, Peabody College of Human Development, USA.
Marie T BanichUniversity of Colorado Boulder, Institute of Cognitive Science, USA; University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, USA. Electronic address: Marie.Banich@colorado.edu.

Funding

VALIDITY OF SUBTYPES OF ADHDP50HD027802 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI ERIK G WILLCUTT · 1990 to 2026
$44.9M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Development of Psychopathology, Psychobiology, & BehaviorT32MH015442 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JASON R TREGELLAS · 1985 to 2026
$10.2M
Early Academic Achievement and Intervention Response: Role of Executive FunctionR37HD095519 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Laurie E Cutting · 2018 to 2026
$5.1M
Neural Correlates of Discourse Processing in AdolescentsR01HD109151 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Laurie E Cutting · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 103537NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD027802NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NICHD NIH HHS R01 109151NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD109151NICHD NIH HHS R37 095519NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD095519NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH015442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This fMRI study of 126 youth explored whether the neural mechanisms underlying the N-back task, commonly used to examine executive control over the contents of working memory, are associated with individual differences in academic achievement in reading and math. Moreover, the study explored whether these relationships occur regardless of the nature of the stimulus being manipulated in working memory (letters, numbers, nonsense shapes) or whether these relationships are specific to achievement domain and stimulus type (i.e., letters for reading and numbers for math). The results indicated that higher academic achievement in each of reading and math was associated with greater activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the N-back task regardless of stimulus type (i.e., did not differ for letters and numbers), suggesting that at least some aspects of the neural mechanisms underlying these academic domains are executive in nature. In addition, regardless of level of academic achievement, prefrontal regions were engaged to a greater degree for letters than numbers than nonsense shapes. In contrast, nonsense shapes yielded greater hippocampal activation than letters and numbers. Potential reasons for this pattern of findings are discussed.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessBrainExecutive FunctionIndividualityMemory, Short-TermAdolescentBrain MappingChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReadingAgeMathN-backReadingStimulusUpdating

Identifiers

PMID38593494
PMCPMC11015100

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.