ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2024
Construction of a prognostic model based on memory CD4+ T cell-associated genes for lung adenocarcinoma and its applications in immunotherapy.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The immune infiltration and prognostic significance of complement and coagulation cascade-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of a prognostic model based on memory CD4+ T cell-associated genes for lung adenocarcinoma and its applications in immunotherapy.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The association between memory CD4+ T cells and cancer prognosis is increasingly recognized, but their impact on lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) prognosis remains unclear. In this study, using the cell-type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcripts algorithm, we analyzed immune cell composition and patient survival in LUAD. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis helped identify memory CD4+ T cell-associated gene modules. Combined with module genes, a five-gene LUAD prognostic risk model (HOXB7, MELTF, ABCC2, GNPNAT1, and LDHA) was constructed by regression analysis. The model was validated using the GSE31210 data set. The validation results demonstrated excellent predictive performance of the risk scoring model. Correlation analysis was conducted between the clinical information and risk scores of LUAD samples, revealing that LUAD patients with disease progression exhibited higher risk scores. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate regression analyses demonstrated the model independent prognostic capability. The constructed nomogram results demonstrated that the predictive performance of the nomogram was superior to the prognostic model and outperformed individual clinical factors. Immune landscape assessment was performed to compare different risk score groups. The results revealed a better prognosis in the low-risk group with higher immune infiltration. The low-risk group also showed potential benefits from immunotherapy. Our study proposes a memory CD4+ T cell-associated gene risk model as a reliable prognostic biomarker for personalized treatment in LUAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.