Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596143›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A deep learning-based approach for predicting COVID-19 diagnosis.

Raafat M Munshi, Mashael M Khayyat, Sami Ben Slama, Manal Mahmoud Khayyat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raafat M MunshiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology (MLT) Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
Mashael M KhayyatDepartment of Information Systems and Technology, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sami Ben SlamaAnalysis and Processing of Electrical and Energy Systems Unit, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, 2092, Tunisia.
Manal Mahmoud KhayyatDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper focuses on forecasting the total count of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Saudi Arabia through a range of methodologies, including ARIMA, mathematical modeling, and deep learning network (DQN) techniques. Its primary aim is to anticipate the verified COVID-19 cases in Saudi Arabia, aiding in decision-making for life-saving interventions by enhancing awareness of COVID-19 infection. Mathematical modeling and ARIMA are employed for their efficacy in forecasting, while DQN approaches, particularly through comparative analysis, are utilized for prediction. This comparative analysis evaluates the predictive capacities of ARIMA, mathematical modeling, and DQN techniques, aiming to pinpoint the most reliable method for forecasting positive COVID-19 cases. The modeling encompasses COVID-19 cases in Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom (UK), and Tunisia (TU) spanning from 2020 to 2021. Predicting the number of individuals likely to test positive for COVID-19 poses a challenge, requiring adherence to fundamental assumptions in mathematical and ARIMA projections. The proposed methodology was implemented on a local server. The DQN algorithm formulates a reward function to uphold target functional performance while balancing training and testing periods. The findings indicate that DQN technology surpasses conventional approaches in efficiency and accuracy for predictions.

Indexed as

ARIMAArtificial intelligenceForecastingMachine learningMathematical modelTime series

Identifiers

PMID38596143
PMCPMC11002549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.