Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38596482›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)

Personal value of Alzheimer's disease biomarker testing and result disclosure from the patient and care partner perspective.

Khushbu J Patel, David Yang, Howard H Feldman, Ging-Yuek R Hsiung, Haakon B Nygaard, John R Best, Emily Dwosh, Julie M Robillard, Mari L DeMarco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of plasma p-tau217/Aβ42, p-tau217, and Aβ42/Aβ40 biomarkers by race to detect Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Blood tests for Alzheimer's disease: The impact of disease prevalence on test performance.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical value of Alzheimer's disease biomarker testing.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Khushbu J PatelDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.
David YangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-4846
Howard H FeldmanDepartment of Neurosciences University of California San Diego San Diego California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9258-4538
Ging-Yuek R HsiungDivision of Neurology Department of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8017-0856
Haakon B NygaardDivision of Neurology Department of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-4723
John R BestGerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-7053
Emily DwoshUBC Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders, University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.
Julie M RobillardDivision of Neurology Department of Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5765-4927
Mari L DeMarcoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-9547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe described patients' and care partners' experiences with Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker testing and result disclosure in routine care.

methodsIMPACT-AD BC is an observational study of clinic patients who underwent AD CSF biomarker testing as part of their routine medical care (

resultsA majority of patients (90%) rated their decision to undergo testing as "easy." Post-disclosure, the majority (82%) reported overall positive feelings from having greater certainty and the ability to plan ahead, and results spurred them to adopt/continue healthy behaviors such as exercise (84%) and cognitive activities (54%). Care partners expressed relief from having more diagnostic certainty, increased appreciation of future caregiving responsibilities, and a desire to connect with support resources. DISCUSSION: Perspectives of persons with lived experience in dementia provide new insight into the value of biomarker testing and should be included as part of evidence-guided considerations for pre-test counseling and result disclosure. Moreover, study findings identify an interval when patients and care partners are highly receptive to positive lifestyle and medical interventions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseasebiomarkerscaregiverscerebrospinal fluidcounselingdecision makingdementiadiagnosisdisclosureemotionslife stylepatients

Identifiers

PMID38596482
PMCPMC10999946

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.