Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598567›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Into the Wild: A novel wild-derived inbred strain resource expands the genomic and phenotypic diversity of laboratory mouse models.

Beth L Dumont, Daniel M Gatti, Mallory A Ballinger, Dana Lin, Megan Phifer-Rixey, Michael J Sheehan, Taichi A Suzuki, Lydia K Wooldridge, Hilda Opoku Frempong, Raman Akinyanju Lawal and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Unpacking the sepsis controversy.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Beth L DumontThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0918-0389
Daniel M GattiThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-9926
Mallory A BallingerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-0608
Dana LinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Megan Phifer-RixeyDepartment of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-6229
Michael J SheehanDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Taichi A SuzukiCollege of Health Solutions and Biodesign Center for Health Through Microbiomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Lydia K WooldridgeThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6285-9142
Hilda Opoku FrempongThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.
Raman Akinyanju LawalThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8908-7664
Gary A ChurchillThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9190-9284
Cathleen LutzThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.
Nadia RosenthalThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.
Jacqueline K WhiteThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, Maine, United States of America.
Michael W NachmanDepartment of Integrative Biology, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, and Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4321-5135

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Mark D ADAMS · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
Use for ResourceP40OD011102 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Stephen A Murray · 2012 to 2026
$15.0M
Population genomics in laboratory and outbred mouse populationsR35GM133415 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BETHANY L DUMONT · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
Natural selection and DNA sequence variation in MusR01GM074245 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NACHMAN, MICHAEL W. · 2005 to 2015
$3.0M
The genomic basis of environmental adaptation in house miceR35GM149304 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MICHAEL W. NACHMAN · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
The genomic basis of environmental adaptation in miceR01GM127468 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NACHMAN, MICHAEL W. · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074245NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127468NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133415NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149304NIH HHS P40 OD011102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory mouse has served as the premier animal model system for both basic and preclinical investigations for over a century. However, laboratory mice capture only a subset of the genetic variation found in wild mouse populations, ultimately limiting the potential of classical inbred strains to uncover phenotype-associated variants and pathways. Wild mouse populations are reservoirs of genetic diversity that could facilitate the discovery of new functional and disease-associated alleles, but the scarcity of commercially available, well-characterized wild mouse strains limits their broader adoption in biomedical research. To overcome this barrier, we have recently developed, sequenced, and phenotyped a set of 11 inbred strains derived from wild-caught Mus musculus domesticus. Each of these "Nachman strains" immortalizes a unique wild haplotype sampled from one of five environmentally distinct locations across North and South America. Whole genome sequence analysis reveals that each strain carries between 4.73-6.54 million single nucleotide differences relative to the GRCm39 mouse reference, with 42.5% of variants in the Nachman strain genomes absent from current classical inbred mouse strain panels. We phenotyped the Nachman strains on a customized pipeline to assess the scope of disease-relevant neurobehavioral, biochemical, physiological, metabolic, and morphological trait variation. The Nachman strains exhibit significant inter-strain variation in >90% of 1119 surveyed traits and expand the range of phenotypic diversity captured in classical inbred strain panels. These novel wild-derived inbred mouse strain resources are set to empower new discoveries in both basic and preclinical research.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMice, Inbred StrainsPhenotypeAnimalsAnimals, WildGenomeGenomicsHaplotypesMicePolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38598567
PMCPMC11034653

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.