ArticleScientific reports2024
Experimental validation and comprehensive analysis of m6A methylation regulators in intervertebral disc degeneration subpopulation classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic research methods and animal models for intervertebral disc degeneration (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- NJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Therapeutic prospects and potential mechanisms of Prdx6: as a novel target in musculoskeletal disorders.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Nano-Drug Delivery System Targeting the Oxidative Stress Microenvironment: A Prospective Strategy for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Treatment.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics and Experimental Validation of FLVCR1 and SOX4 in Regulating Mitochondria-Macrophage Crosstalk in Disc Degeneration.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- YTHDF2-dependent mCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is one of the most prevalent causes of chronic low back pain. The role of m6A methylation modification in disc degeneration (IVDD) remains unclear. We investigated immune-related m6A methylation regulators as IVDD biomarkers through comprehensive analysis and experimental validation of m6A methylation regulators in disc degeneration. The training dataset was downloaded from the GEO database and analysed for differentially expressed m6A methylation regulators and immunological features, the differentially regulators were subsequently validated by a rat IVDD model and RT-qPCR. Further screening of key m6A methylation regulators based on machine learning and LASSO regression analysis. Thereafter, a predictive model based on key m6A methylation regulators was constructed for training sets, which was validated by validation set. IVDD patients were then clustered based on the expression of key m6A regulators, and the expression of key m6A regulators and immune infiltrates between clusters was investigated to determine immune markers in IVDD. Finally, we investigated the potential role of the immune marker in IVDD through enrichment analysis, protein-to-protein network analysis, and molecular prediction. By analysising of the training set, we revealed significant differences in gene expression of five methylation regulators including RBM15, YTHDC1, YTHDF3, HNRNPA2B1 and ALKBH5, while finding characteristic immune infiltration of differentially expressed genes, the result was validated by PCR. We then screen the differential m6A regulators in the training set and identified RBM15 and YTHDC1 as key m6A regulators. We then used RBM15 and YTHDC1 to construct a predictive model for IVDD and successfully validated it in the training set. Next, we clustered IVDD patients based on the expression of RBM15 and YTHDC1 and explored the immune infiltration characteristics between clusters as well as the expression of RBM15 and YTHDC1 in the clusters. YTHDC1 was finally identified as an immune biomarker for IVDD. We finally found that YTHDC1 may influence the immune microenvironment of IVDD through ABL1 and TXK. In summary, our results suggest that YTHDC1 is a potential biomarker for the development of IVDD and may provide new insights for the precise prevention and treatment of IVDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.