Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600860›Full record

ReviewThe plant genome2025

History and current status of embryogenic culture-based tissue culture, transformation and gene editing of maize (Zea mays L.).

Frank L McFarland, Heidi F Kaeppler

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank L McFarlandDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Heidi F KaepplerDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-7912

Funding

Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 1917138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of embryogenic callus and somatic embryos is integral to the genetic improvement of crops via genetic transformation and gene editing. Regenerable embryogenic cultures also form the backbone of many micro-propagation processes for crop species. In many species, including maize, the ability to produce embryogenic cultures is highly genotype dependent. While some modern transformation and genome editing methods reduce genotype dependence, these efforts ultimately fall short of producing truly genotype-independent tissue culture methods. Recalcitrant genotypes are still identified in these genotype-flexible processes, and their presence is magnified by the stark contrast with more amenable lines, which may respond more efficiently by orders of magnitude. This review aims to describe the history of research into somatic embryogenesis, embryogenic tissue cultures, and plant transformation, with particular attention paid to maize. Contemporary research into genotype-flexible morphogenic gene-based transformation and genome engineering is also covered in this review. The rapid evolution of plant biotechnology from nascent technologies in the latter half of the 20th century to well-established, work-horse production processes has, and will continue to, fundamentally changed agriculture and plant genetics research.

Indexed as

Gene EditingPlant Somatic Embryogenesis TechniquesTissue Culture TechniquesTransformation, GeneticZea maysHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyPlants, Genetically Modified

Identifiers

PMID38600860
PMCPMC11733668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.