ArticleHeliyon2024
A new minimal invasive technique with in-situ stent-graft fenestration for type A aortic dissection.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proximal adventitial inversion with distal single-branch stent grafting versus Sun's procedure in acute type A aortic dissection: a comparative study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Neurological complications post aortic arch surgery: a state of art review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Perioperative and short-term outcomes of total arch reconstruction using a novel frozen elephant trunk stent.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Medium and long-term aortic remodeling following aortic valve replacement combined with anticoagulation for DeBakey I aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic surgery successfully improves the prognosis of patients with type A aortic dissection. However, total arch replacement and reconstruction remain challenging. This study presents a new surgical modality, the in-situ stent-graft fenestration (ISSF) technique, for simplifying aortic arch reconstruction and assesses its short-term efficacy and safety in patients with type A aortic dissection. Methods: Data from 177 patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent aortic arch reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Sun's procedure was performed in 90 patients and ISSF was performed in the other 87. Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.8% in the Sun's procedure group and 3.4% in the ISSF group ( Conclusions: The ISSF technique appears to be an effective and safe alternative to conventional surgical procedures for patients with type A aortic dissection, with the potential to simplify the procedure, shorten the operation time, and yield satisfactory operative results. However, further investigation is needed to determine its long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.