Evidence mapPaperPMID 38610746Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Stroke: A Narrative Review.

Christina Zompola, Lina Palaiodimou, Konstantinos Voumvourakis, Leonidas Stefanis, Aristeidis H Katsanos, Else C Sandset, Estathios Boviatsis, Georgios Tsivgoulis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina ZompolaSecond Department of Neurology, "Attikon" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Lina PalaiodimouSecond Department of Neurology, "Attikon" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7757-609X
Konstantinos VoumvourakisSecond Department of Neurology, "Attikon" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Leonidas StefanisFirst Department of Neurology, "Aeginition" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Aristeidis H KatsanosDivision of Neurology, McMaster University/Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON L8L2X2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6359-0023
Else C SandsetStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, N-0424 Oslo, Norway.
Estathios BoviatsisSecond Department of Neurosurgery, "Attikon" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8000-9739
Georgios TsivgoulisSecond Department of Neurology, "Attikon" University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0640-3797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of blood pressure variability (BPV) in acute stroke presents a complex challenge with profound implications for patient outcomes. This narrative review examines the role of BPV across various stages of acute stroke care, highlighting its impact on treatment strategies and prognostic considerations. In the prehospital setting, while guidelines lack specific recommendations for BP management, emerging evidence suggests a potential link between BPV and outcomes. Among ischaemic stroke patients who are ineligible for reperfusion therapies, BPV independently influences functional outcomes, emphasising the need for individualised approaches to BP control. During intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy, the intricate interplay between BP levels, recanalisation status, and BPV is evident. Striking a balance between aggressive BP lowering and avoiding hypoperfusion-related complications is essential. Intracerebral haemorrhage management is further complicated by BPV, which emerges as a predictor of mortality and disability, necessitating nuanced BP management strategies. Finally, among patients with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage, increased BPV may be correlated with a rebleeding risk and worse outcomes, emphasizing the need for BPV monitoring in this population. Integration of BPV assessment into clinical practice and research protocols is crucial for refining treatment strategies that are tailored to individual patient needs. Future studies should explore novel interventions targeting BPV modulation to optimise stroke care outcomes.

Indexed as

acute strokeblood pressure variability

Identifiers

PMID38610746
PMCPMC11012361

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.