Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38612610›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Reconstruction with the Chitosan-Based Novel Haemostatic Agent in Ovine Model-Preliminary Report.

Klaudia Stangel-Wójcikiewicz, Maciej Murawski, Tomasz Schwarz, Krzysztof Skotniczny, Agnieszka Fuchs, Jan Wolski, Julia Radwan-Pragłowska, Łukasz Janus, Marek Piątkowski, Marta Kot and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Klaudia Stangel-WójcikiewiczDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 23, 31-501 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-6767
Maciej MurawskiDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Biotechnology and Fisheries, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, ul. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-7755
Tomasz SchwarzDepartment of Genetics, Animal Breeding and Ethology, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, ul. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3759-7002
Krzysztof SkotnicznyDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 23, 31-501 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4240-3505
Agnieszka FuchsDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 23, 31-501 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-7465-1383
Jan WolskiDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 23, 31-501 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0009-0001-2397-5164
Julia Radwan-PragłowskaDepartment of Biotechnology and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5909-6121
Łukasz JanusDepartment of Biotechnology and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.
Marek PiątkowskiDepartment of Biotechnology and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9637-1284
Marta KotDepartment of Transplantation, Institute of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Wielicka 265, 30-663 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-0411
Andrzej WróbelSecond Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5772-0573
Dorota WojtysiakDepartment of Genetics, Animal Breeding and Ethology, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, ul. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4713-9902
Przemysław UrbaniecThe University Hospital in Kraków, ul, Kopernika 36, 31-501 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1099-884X
Jagiellonian University · PLCracow University of Technology · PLUniversity of Agriculture in Krakow · PLKrakow Cardiovascular Research Institute · PLMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

National Centre for Research and Development LIDER/21/0120/L-10/18/NCBR/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective study aimed to assess the feasibility of chitosan biomaterial and subcutaneous gel implantation in an ovine model, with implications for women with genital prolapse. Twenty-four ewes were divided into four groups (n = 6 per group): chitosan type B, chitosan type C, chitosan unmodified injections, and polypropylene mesh. Ovine models were chosen due to their morphological resemblance to human reproductive organs. Animals were sacrificed after 90 days for macroscopic, pathomorphological, and immunohistochemical analysis. In the chitosan type B group, IL-6 and IL-10 levels decreased after 28 days, while chitosan type C and injection groups exhibited higher IL-6 than IL-10 levels. The polypropylene group displayed the highest IL-6 and lowest IL-10 levels. Histological examination of the polypropylene group revealed no degenerative changes or inflammation, whereas chitosan injection induced local inflammation. Other groups exhibited no degenerative changes. Ewes implanted with chitosan displayed reduced inflammation compared to polypropylene-implanted ewes. Chitosan implantation facilitated vaginal tissue healing, in contrast to polypropylene mesh, which led to extrusion. While chitosan holds promise as an alternative to polypropylene mesh, further research is imperative for comprehensive evaluation. This study suggests the potential of a chitosan biomaterial in pelvic organ prolapse treatment, warranting additional investigation.

Indexed as

ChitosanHemostaticsPelvic Organ ProlapseAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleHumansInflammationInterleukin-10Interleukin-6PolypropylenesProspective StudiesSheepVaginaBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanHemostaticsInterleukin-10Interleukin-6Polypropylenesanimal modelbiomaterialschitosan haemostatic agentovinepelvic organ prolapse

Identifiers

PMID38612610
PMCPMC11011902
OpenAlexW4393278814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.